Silicone Body Mounts vs. Rubber (Longevity & Performance)

In Pickups, SUVs & automotive components, the materials from which parts are fashioned often play a pivotal role in their efficacy and longevity.

Specifically with body mounts, they are subtle but crucial component that cushions the connection between a vehicle’s body and its frame, the debate often centers around two primary materials: silicone and rubber. 

Silicone body mounts & bushings typically offer superior temperature resistance and longevity compared to rubber mounts. However, rubber mounts & bushings can provide better vibration dampening. In performance scenarios, silicone might outlast rubber, but rubber can offer smoother ride quality. Choose based on your priority.

Silicone and rubber mounts and bushings
Silicone and rubber mounts and bushings

This article explores a comparative analysis of both, examining the nuances of their performance and how each fare over time.

It offers readers an insight into the most optimal choice for their needs.


Understanding Body Mounts

Body mounts are indispensable in the automotive world, acting as the intermediary between a vehicle’s frame and body.

These components, often taken for granted, serve the dual purpose of absorbing shocks from the road and ensuring a smoother ride, all while preventing metal-on-metal contact, which could result in unwanted noises and faster wear.

Constructed from materials designed to offer cushioning, such as rubber or silicone, body mounts ensure that the passengers and vehicle components are insulated from most jolts and vibrations even while navigating rugged terrains or uneven roads.

The choice of material can significantly influence these mounts’ performance, comfort, and longevity, thus making it a topic of interest for manufacturers and vehicle enthusiasts.

Material Basics: Silicone and Rubber Unveiled

Silicone is a versatile and resilient material derived from silica, found in sand and quartz. Due to its chemical composition, silicone boasts exceptional temperature resistance, which can withstand extremely high and low temperatures without degrading.

Its flexibility remains consistent across a broad temperature range, making it less likely to become brittle in cold conditions or too soft in hot ones. Additionally, silicone is resistant to UV rays, ozone, and other environmental factors, contributing to its impressive longevity.

On the other hand, rubber is a natural material harvested primarily from the latex of rubber trees. It’s been utilized for its elastic properties for centuries. Rubber’s inherent flexibility and capacity to absorb shocks make it an ideal choice for various applications, including automotive mounts.

However, rubber can degrade over time, especially when exposed to ozone, UV rays, and certain chemicals. Its temperature resistance is also generally lower than silicone’s, meaning it might not fare as well under extreme conditions.

Both materials have unique advantages, and their choice often hinges on specific application requirements and desired performance characteristics.

Longevity Analysis: How Silicone vs Rubber Ages

Silicone is renowned for its resilience and longevity.

The molecular structure of silicone gives it a distinctive advantage when exposed to adverse environmental factors. With superior resistance to UV radiation, ozone, and extreme temperatures, silicone degrade much slower than many other materials. 

Moreover, it retains its flexibility over a longer period, which means that even with age, it’s less prone to becoming brittle or losing its cushioning abilities.

However, it’s worth noting that while silicone might outlast other materials in terms of structural integrity, its performance attributes might evolve with time.

Natural rubber, while robust and flexible, has certain vulnerabilities. Over time, rubber can oxidize and begin to break down, which can be accelerated when exposed to UV rays or ozone.

This often makes the material hard, brittle, and less effective at dampening vibrations. The presence of certain chemicals, oils, and greases can further expedite the degradation process. 

There are, however, various types of synthetic rubbers with differing properties, some of which are engineered to be more resistant to specific types of wear and environmental challenges.

But, on the whole, traditional rubber mounts may need replacement sooner than their silicone counterparts, especially if exposed to harsh conditions regularly.

Performance Metrics: Vibration, Dampening, and Rigidity

Vibration Control:

  • Silicone: Silicone is inherently flexible, allowing it to absorb much vibration. It’s uniform consistency and molecular composition provides consistent vibration absorption over a wide temperature range. However, it might not be as effective as rubber in extreme vibration scenarios.
  • Rubber: Rubber’s natural elastic properties make it adept at absorbing vibrations. The intrinsic springiness and damping characteristics of rubber allow it to neutralize a broader range of frequencies, making it a preferred choice for applications with severe vibrations.

Dampening Abilities:

  • Silicone: While silicone can absorb shocks to some extent, its primary strength isn’t in dampening sudden or sharp impacts. It offers a consistent dampening performance across various temperatures but may not provide the same level of cushioning as rubber under high-impact scenarios.
  • Rubber: Rubber excels in dampening capabilities. Its natural composition makes it exceptionally responsive to sudden shocks and impacts. The rubber’s compressibility and quick rebound properties ensure it can cushion and dissipate energy effectively, protecting vehicle components from potential damage.

Rigidity and Structural Integrity:

  • Silicone: Silicone mounts tend to maintain their shape and rigidity over time, especially when exposed to fluctuating temperatures. This means they can offer a more predictable and uniform performance over their lifespan but might not provide the same flexibility as rubber in certain scenarios.
  • Rubber: Fresh rubber mounts exhibit a balance between flexibility and rigidity, offering a blend of stability and cushioning. However, as rubber ages, it can either become too soft (losing its rigidity) or too hard (becoming brittle), affecting its performance.

In sum, while both silicone and rubber have their respective strengths in vibration control, dampening, and rigidity, the ideal choice would depend on the specific requirements of the application and the conditions under which the vehicle operates.

Temperature Resistance: A Tale of Two Materials

Silicone is celebrated for its remarkable temperature resistance.

Silicone consistently showcases its resilience, whether subjected to a desert’s blistering heat or a polar vortex’s sub-zero conditions. Its molecular structure retains its properties across a vast temperature range.

This means silicone stands strong in conditions where many other materials might melt, become too soft, or turn brittle and crack. Its resistance to both high-temperature oxidation and low-temperature brittleness makes it a favorite for applications where temperature extremes are a concern.

Rubber, by its very nature, is susceptible to temperature variations. Rubber can become soft in elevated temperatures, reducing its effectiveness as a cushion or shock absorber.

This softening can also lead to deformation, especially if the rubber component is bearing a load. Conversely, rubber tends to harden and become less flexible in extremely cold conditions.

This brittleness can make it susceptible to cracks, tears, or even complete failure under stress. It’s worth noting, however, that various types of synthetic rubber formulations are designed to improve temperature resistance, but traditional natural rubber has these inherent limitations.

In the narrative of temperature resistance, while both materials have their roles and specific applications, silicone undoubtedly emerges as the more thermally robust contender.

However, it’s essential to consider other performance metrics and the actual operating conditions before deciding between the two.

Environmental Impact: Sustainability and Degradation

Silicone’s Environmental Footprint:

  1. Production: Producing silicone involves extracting silica from sand. While silica is abundant, the extraction process can lead to land degradation. Moreover, converting silica to silicone requires energy-intensive processes, adding to its carbon footprint.
  2. Degradation: Silicone is durable, both an advantage and a drawback. Its resistance to environmental factors means it doesn’t degrade quickly, potentially leading to long-lasting waste in landfills. However, it doesn’t release toxic compounds as it breaks down, which is a plus.
  3. Recyclability: While silicone recycling is possible, it’s not as widespread or straightforward as other materials. Innovations are ongoing to improve its recyclability, but many discarded silicone products are in landfills.

Rubber’s Environmental Story:

  1. Production: Natural rubber is sourced from rubber trees, making it renewable. However, the growing demand has led to deforestation in some areas, impacting biodiversity. Synthetic rubbers, derived from petrochemicals, carry the environmental implications of the oil industry.
  2. Degradation: Natural rubber is biodegradable, breaking down over time when exposed to natural elements. Synthetic rubbers vary in their degradation rates, but many do not break down as easily, contributing to persistent environmental waste.
  3. Recyclability: Rubber, especially tires, has seen significant recycling efforts. Recycled rubber finds its way into various applications, from road construction to playground surfaces. However, the recycling process can sometimes be energy-intensive.

Both silicone and rubber have their environmental pros and cons. While rubber offers the benefit of biodegradability, its production, especially in the case of synthetic variants, can have significant ecological implications.

With its durable nature, silicone presents challenges in waste management but may reduce the frequency of replacements, leading to less overall waste.

Consumers and industries should weigh these factors to make truly eco-friendly choices, keeping an eye on advancements in sustainable production methods, recycling technologies, and innovative alternatives for both materials.

Closing Thoughts

In conclusion, our exploration into the world of silicone and rubber body mounts has shed light on the critical factors that influence the performance and longevity of these often-overlooked automotive components.

This comparative analysis has provided valuable insights for both automotive enthusiasts and manufacturers, enabling informed decisions when it comes to choosing the right material for specific needs.

Body mounts, the silent heroes of the automotive world, serve as a crucial link between a vehicle’s frame and body. The choice of material – silicone or rubber – plays a pivotal role in determining how effectively these mounts cushion shocks, absorb vibrations, and endure over time.

Each material has its unique strengths and weaknesses, making the decision a matter of priorities and application requirements.

Silicone, renowned for its exceptional temperature resistance and longevity, offers a compelling choice for those seeking durability over the long haul. It can withstand extreme temperatures, UV radiation, and ozone exposure without losing its flexibility or structural integrity.

However, its performance may evolve with age, particularly in scenarios demanding high-impact vibration dampening.

Rubber, on the other hand, excels in vibration dampening, making it a preferred choice for applications with severe vibrations. Its natural elasticity allows it to absorb shocks effectively, providing a smoother ride quality.

However, rubber may require more frequent replacement compared to silicone, especially when exposed to harsh environmental conditions.

The performance metrics, such as vibration control, dampening abilities, and structural rigidity, underscore the strengths of each material. Silicone exhibits consistent vibration absorption and is less prone to hardening or brittleness with age.

In contrast, rubber, with its inherent elasticity, excels in dampening capabilities, particularly for sudden shocks and impacts.

Temperature resistance is another critical consideration. Silicone stands as the undisputed champion in this regard, withstanding extreme temperatures without degradation. Rubber, by nature, is susceptible to temperature variations, which can affect its performance.

Environmental impact and sustainability also play a significant role in material choice. While both silicone and rubber have their ecological implications in terms of production and degradation, consumers and industries should weigh these factors to make environmentally conscious decisions.

Sustainable production methods, recycling technologies, and alternative materials are continually evolving in this regard.

Ultimately, the choice between silicone and rubber body mounts depends on specific priorities, application requirements, and operating conditions.

This comparative analysis serves as a valuable resource, empowering individuals and manufacturers to make informed decisions that optimize the performance and longevity of their vehicles while considering environmental sustainability.


Rubber vs Polyurethane Suspension Bushings

Bushings Can Make A Huge Difference In How Your Car Drives: What You Need To Know